Coalition

Coalition Competitive Intelligence & Landscape

coalitioninc.com ·

Overview

Coalition Overview

The Research Coalition is a collective organization dedicated to advocating for increased research funding and fostering innovation at a national and global level. While there are several organizations with similar names, notable examples include The Science Coalition, established in 1994, which comprises over 50 leading public and private research universities in the United States, focusing on sustaining federal investment in scientific research to stimulate economic growth and innovation (The Science Coalition). Another example is the Coalition for Canadian Research, which aims to bolster research funding in Canada to maintain its competitive edge and support innovation (Research Coalition Canada). Additionally, Business for Federal Research Funding advocates for strong federal research investment to drive economic and technological progress (ResearchFunding.org). These organizations typically target policymakers, research institutions, and industry stakeholders to promote increased funding, collaboration, and policy reforms to support scientific advancement. Their core mission revolves around ensuring sustained investment in research to foster innovation, economic growth, and global competitiveness. The exact founding year and headquarters vary among these groups, but their overarching goal remains to advance research efforts through advocacy and policy influence.
Coalition

Coalition Weekly Intel Updates

Receive weekly intel updates about Coalition straight to your inbox.

Competitors

Coalition Competitors

Competitor 1: Asana is a prominent project management platform that offers extensive features such as workflows, automation, goals, and reporting, targeting enterprise, small business, and nonprofit sectors (Asana). Its key differentiators include AI integration with Asana AI, smart assists, and a broad suite of app integrations, making it a flexible tool for team collaboration and task management. Compared to Coalition, Asana's focus is more on internal project workflows rather than cyber insurance or risk management, and its pricing varies across plans, with a strong market share in project management software.

Competitor 2: Medium's case study on Coalition highlights Coalition's strategic approach to global expansion and its focus on active cyber insurance, which actively assesses, prevents, and responds to cyber risks using security tech and broad coverage (Medium). Coalition's key differentiator is its active insurance model, integrating cyber risk insights with threat monitoring and data leak intelligence, positioning it uniquely in the cyber insurance market. Its market share is significant within the cyber insurance industry, especially for organizations seeking proactive risk management solutions, contrasting with more traditional insurers.

Competitor 3: Atlas offers AI-powered research tools and knowledge management platforms tailored for academic and industry collaborations, emphasizing building comprehensive research knowledge bases through uploading and synthesizing sources (Atlas). Its focus on connecting insights across sources and visual mapping sets it apart from Coalition, which is centered on cyber risk and insurance solutions. Atlas's pricing and market share are oriented toward research institutions and academic sectors, making it a direct competitor in research management software.

Competitor 4: Fibi Research System provides integrated research administration software that streamlines grants, compliance, and agreements for research institutions (Fibi). Its key differentiators include a fully integrated platform tailored for institutional research management, contrasting with Coalition's focus on cyber insurance and risk assessment. Fibi’s market share is concentrated within research institutions that need comprehensive administrative solutions, positioning it differently from Coalition’s specialized cyber risk offerings.

Product & Pricing

Coalition Product and Pricing Intelligence

Research Coalition Product and Pricing Intelligence platforms offer a variety of pricing plans, tiers, and features tailored to different user needs. For example, Apistemic provides a flexible, transparent pricing model starting with a free tier that includes 20 million companies and 100 API calls per month, suitable for testing and small projects. Their paid plans, such as the Pro at $999/month, offer increased API calls, advanced analytics, custom integrations, and priority support, while the Enterprise plan offers unlimited API calls and custom solutions for large organizations (Apistemic).

Similarly, Elicit offers a free Basic plan with limited automated reports and unlimited search capabilities, with paid options like Plus at $7/month and Pro at $29/month, which include additional features such as export options, more automated reports, and API access. Their scale and enterprise plans are tailored for larger research needs, with custom pricing (Elicit).

Other platforms like CB Insights and RightPrice also provide tiered pricing structures, with CB Insights focusing on high-stakes decision-making tools for Fortune 500 companies, and RightPrice offering a pay-per-product tracking model starting from free to enterprise solutions, emphasizing flexibility and scalability (CB Insights, RightPrice). Recent pricing updates reflect a trend towards customizable, usage-based models that cater to both small businesses and large enterprises, with some platforms introducing new features and tiers to meet evolving market demands (Realytics).

Ad Campaigns

Coalition Ad Campaigns

Coalition is currently running 221 ads across Google, LinkedIn — 10 on Google and 211 on LinkedIn. Explore Coalition's live ad creative, messaging, and the platforms they advertise on in the ad library — updated automatically by ForesightIQ.

See of Coalition's ads

View ads

Hiring & Layoffs

Coalition Hiring and Layoffs

Recent hiring trends in 2026 indicate a dynamic and evolving talent landscape driven by technological advancements, economic uncertainty, and shifting workforce priorities. According to Randstad, traditional recruitment methods are becoming obsolete, with companies increasingly relying on AI and tech-enabled roles, signaling a strategic shift towards digital transformation and innovation (randstadusa.com). Similarly, the American Staffing Association highlights cautious hiring amid economic fluctuations, with a focus on internal mobility and upskilling, reflecting a strategic emphasis on workforce resilience (americanstaffing.net). Notably, companies like Google Research and Anthropic are actively hiring AI researchers and safety experts, signaling a strong investment in AI development and safety research, which aligns with broader trends of AI becoming central to corporate strategies (edtechinnovationhub.com, blockchain.news). While some reports mention ongoing recruitment campaigns for research roles at institutions like Inria, overall, the hiring pattern suggests a strategic focus on AI, cybersecurity, and technological innovation, with companies and research institutions positioning themselves for long-term growth in these fields.

Leadership

Coalition Management and Leadership Team

The Research Coalition Management and Leadership Team typically includes key executives, board members, and notable hires at the C-suite level, although specific details can vary depending on the organization. Recent leadership changes often involve appointing new CEOs or executive directors to steer strategic initiatives and enhance organizational effectiveness. For example, the Health Research Council of New Zealand has a dedicated executive leadership team led by Professor Sunny Collings, who has been the Chief Executive since February 2020, focusing on health research strategy and policy implementation (Health Research Council of New Zealand).

While the search results do not specify a particular coalition or its current leadership roster, such teams generally comprise senior executives responsible for operations, research, and strategic growth, along with board members who provide governance oversight. Notable recent hires at the C-suite level often include roles like Chief Executive Officers, Chief Operating Officers, and Chief Financial Officers, depending on organizational needs. For detailed, up-to-date information about a specific coalition's leadership team, consulting the organization's official website or recent press releases is recommended.

Financials

Coalition Financial Performance, Fundraising, M&A

Coalition Greenwich, a prominent provider of financial analytics and benchmarking data, was acquired by CRISIL, a subsidiary of S&P Global, during 2019-2020. This acquisition aimed to enhance CRISIL's position in benchmarking analytics and financial market intelligence (Umbrex). While specific revenue figures and valuation details are not publicly disclosed, Coalition Greenwich is recognized as a unicorn as of March 2026, indicating a valuation exceeding $1 billion (Tracxn). The firm has also engaged in funding rounds, although precise figures are not available due to technical issues accessing detailed financial data (Tracxn).

In terms of financial performance, Coalition Greenwich reported an 8.9% increase in global markets trading revenue in 2024, driven by growth in equities, securitization, and macro products amid economic uncertainty (Coalition Greenwich PDF). Although specific M&A activity details are limited, the firm’s strategic focus remains on providing high-value insights and analytics, supporting its continued growth and market relevance.

Partnerships

Coalition Partnerships, Clients and Vendors

Research coalition partnerships often involve collaborations with leading technology vendors, research institutions, and industry organizations to build secure and innovative ecosystems. For example, Duality Technologies partners with major cloud providers like AWS, Google, and Microsoft Azure to enhance data protection and privacy-preserving solutions, integrating their platforms and tools to enable secure data collaboration across sectors (Duality). Similarly, IBM Research collaborates through its extensive ecosystem, including the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab and the IBM Quantum Network, working with Fortune 500 companies, universities, and startups to advance AI, quantum computing, and other cutting-edge technologies (IBM Research).

Key enterprise clients include organizations involved in healthcare, finance, and technology sectors, with collaborations aimed at developing innovative solutions. For instance, Roche participates in the Data Science Coalition, sharing healthcare data and expertise to improve patient care and health system decision-making, involving public and private organizations globally (Roche). Additionally, research partnerships extend into AI, machine learning, and data analytics, with organizations like ISG-One fostering research collaborations to develop advanced analytics and AI solutions (ISG-One).

Technology integrations and ecosystem relationships are central to these collaborations, with companies like NVIDIA and NVIDIA supporting joint development efforts in AI and quantum computing. These alliances enable the sharing of expertise, resources, and data, fostering innovation and accelerating the deployment of advanced technologies across industries. Overall, these partnerships demonstrate a strategic focus on building robust, collaborative ecosystems that drive technological advancement and enterprise growth (Duality, IBM).

Events

Coalition Event Participations

The Research Coalition actively participates in various industry events, including conferences, trade shows, webinars, and community events. Notably, the Coalition for Secure AI (CoSAI) was featured at RSAC 2026, where they led discussions on secure AI and presented sessions such as "Securing MCP: Mitigating New Threats in Agentic AI Deployments" on March 25, 2026 (Coalition for Secure AI). This event highlights their role in shaping conversations around AI security and their engagement with industry stakeholders at major cybersecurity conferences.

Additionally, the Safe Online + Tech Coalition hosted a research workshop at TrustCon 2024, focusing on collaboration between researchers and industry professionals to combat digital harms (Technology Coalition). This demonstrates their commitment to community engagement through webinars and workshops aimed at fostering industry collaboration and advancing research in online safety.

Overall, the Research Coalition's event participation spans high-profile conferences like RSAC and community-focused workshops such as TrustCon, emphasizing their active involvement in industry dialogue, security innovation, and community outreach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Coalition's unicorn valuation signal about its competitive position in the cyber insurance market?

Coalition's recognition as a unicorn — implying a valuation above $1 billion as of March 2026 — suggests the market is assigning a meaningful premium to its active cyber insurance model, which integrates real-time threat monitoring, data leak intelligence, and risk assessment alongside traditional coverage. This differentiates it sharply from conventional insurers who underwrite risk without actively managing it. The valuation indicates investor confidence that proactive, tech-enabled cyber risk management is a durable wedge against legacy competitors, though precise revenue figures and funding round details remain undisclosed.

What does Coalition's 8.9% revenue growth in 2024 tell us about its trajectory — sustainable expansion or a cyclical bump?

Coalition Greenwich reported an 8.9% increase in global markets trading revenue in 2024, driven by growth in equities, securitization, and macro products amid elevated economic uncertainty — suggesting the growth is at least partially cyclical, tied to volatile market conditions that boost demand for financial benchmarking and analytics. Whether this is sustainable depends on whether the macro volatility environment persists and whether the firm can expand into new product lines beyond trading revenue analytics. The absence of disclosed net income or operating margin data makes it difficult to assess whether top-line growth is translating into durable profitability.

What does Coalition's acquisition by CRISIL/S&P Global imply for its strategic independence and product roadmap?

Coalition Greenwich's acquisition by CRISIL, an S&P Global subsidiary, during 2019–2020 effectively embedded it within one of the world's largest financial intelligence ecosystems, which constrains full strategic independence but also provides distribution leverage and data infrastructure. The logical implication for product roadmap is a continued deepening of benchmarking and analytics capabilities tied to S&P Global's broader data assets, rather than pivoting into adjacent markets independently. Corp-dev teams should treat Coalition Greenwich less as a standalone acquisition target and more as a product division within CRISIL's portfolio.

What does Coalition's presence at RSAC 2026 — specifically leading sessions on agentic AI security — signal about where it is placing product bets?

Coalition's participation in RSAC 2026 under the Coalition for Secure AI (CoSAI) banner, including a dedicated session titled 'Securing MCP: Mitigating New Threats in Agentic AI Deployments,' signals a deliberate positioning at the intersection of AI security and cyber risk — an area most traditional cyber insurers have not yet addressed at this technical depth. Running sessions on agentic AI threats suggests Coalition is building underwriting or risk-assessment capabilities specifically for AI-driven enterprise environments, which would be a meaningful product differentiator as agentic AI deployments proliferate. This also signals a go-to-market intent to be seen as a thought-leader shaping standards, not just a policy issuer.

How does Coalition's active insurance model structurally differentiate it from compliance-automation competitors like Vanta or Drata?

Coalition's active cyber insurance model combines policy coverage with continuous threat monitoring and data leak intelligence, meaning it sits upstream of a breach event rather than helping organizations demonstrate compliance after the fact. Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe are compliance-automation platforms — they help companies pass audits and maintain certifications but do not carry insurance risk or provide real-time threat response. This structural difference means Coalition is competing for a different budget line (insurance spend vs. GRC tooling spend) and has a fundamentally different revenue model based on premiums rather than SaaS subscriptions.

What does Coalition's CoSAI initiative suggest about its partnerships and ecosystem-building strategy?

The Coalition for Secure AI (CoSAI) positions Coalition as a convener of industry stakeholders around AI security standards, rather than a purely bilateral technology partner. Leading discussions at RSAC 2026 on topics like securing Model Context Protocol (MCP) suggests Coalition is working to build an ecosystem of enterprises, security vendors, and policymakers aligned around frameworks it helps author — a strategy that can embed Coalition's risk taxonomy into how the broader market thinks about AI-related cyber exposure. This is a classic standards-play: if the industry adopts Coalition-influenced frameworks, Coalition gains a structural advantage in underwriting AI-era cyber risk.

What does the competitive landscape — including Qualys, Vanta, and traditional insurers — imply about the white space Coalition is targeting?

The competitive set around Coalition includes cloud-based security platforms like Qualys (10,300+ enterprise customers, vulnerability management focus) and compliance-automation players like Vanta (12,000+ companies), but none of these carry insurance risk or bundle coverage with active monitoring in the way Coalition does. Traditional cyber insurers lack the security-tech stack, while security platforms lack the risk-transfer mechanism. Coalition's white space is the integrated layer: organizations that want a single vendor to both monitor their cyber exposure in real time and transfer the residual risk via insurance — a position that neither pure-play security vendors nor legacy insurers currently occupy.

What does the broader 2026 hiring trend toward AI and cybersecurity roles imply for Coalition's talent strategy and build-vs-buy decisions?

The 2026 hiring environment is characterized by intense competition for AI researchers and cybersecurity specialists, with major players like Google and Anthropic aggressively recruiting safety and AI talent. For Coalition, which needs both insurance actuarial expertise and security engineering capability, this creates pressure on organic hiring timelines and suggests acquisitions of smaller cyber-risk startups with embedded technical teams may be a faster path to capability expansion. The cautious hiring posture described across the broader market — emphasizing internal mobility and upskilling — also implies Coalition may be investing in reskilling existing staff toward AI-augmented underwriting workflows rather than pure headcount growth.

What does Coalition's engagement with TrustCon-style workshops signal about its strategy in the online safety and research community?

Coalition's participation in events like the TrustCon 2024 research workshop, focused on combating digital harms through researcher-industry collaboration, signals an investment in credibility with the academic and policy research community — not just enterprise sales channels. This is consistent with a strategy of embedding Coalition's frameworks and data into independent research outputs, which then influence regulatory standards and enterprise risk-management norms. For a cyber insurer, shaping the research discourse on digital harm is a long-term competitive moat: it influences how risk is defined, measured, and ultimately priced.

Is Coalition's financial profile more consistent with a standalone IPO candidate or a strategic acquisition target?

Coalition Greenwich's current profile — unicorn valuation, integration within CRISIL/S&P Global's infrastructure, and undisclosed but growing revenue — reads more like a business unit within a larger strategic than a standalone IPO candidate. Its revenue growth is tied to financial markets volatility cycles rather than a purely recurring SaaS-style model, and its financial disclosures are limited, which would require significant restructuring for public-market transparency. A more plausible near-term scenario is deeper integration into S&P Global's data products or a potential carve-out if CRISIL repositions its portfolio — rather than an independent listing.

What does Coalition's pricing and product intelligence suggest about whether it is moving upmarket toward enterprise or staying focused on the mid-market?

The available product and pricing intelligence for platforms in Coalition's competitive space shows a clear bifurcation: usage-based and tiered SaaS models at the mid-market end, versus custom enterprise agreements for large-scale deployments. Coalition's active cyber insurance model — which bundles security monitoring with coverage — structurally lends itself to enterprise contracts where the premium scale justifies the integrated service layer, suggesting an upmarket motion. However, specific pricing tiers and minimum contract thresholds for Coalition itself are not publicly disclosed, so the pace and extent of any enterprise push cannot be precisely characterized from available data.

Powered by ForesightIQ · Competitive intelligence from digital exhaust